Watch closely … you won’t see something (and that something is definitely missing from the replacement car).
Wonder what Ben Jones thinks of this.
For more …
UPDATE: Speaking of Pavlov’s dog, you knew someone from Florida would respond immediately with a post showing dogs bearing badannas featuring the US flag, and noticed that this was a disgrace, too. We agree, and we thank her for implying that Norwood “Tripp” Lewis thus disgraced the Confederate battle flag by allowing it to be used in such a derogatory fashion. We await her condemnation of Lewis on the Virginia Flagger blog she manages. Otherwise, she’d be a hypocrite. Fetch, Connie!
Sometimes it’s too easy.
You might want to take a look at this article, in which James Oakes compares his approach to the study of slavery, antislavery, and the coming of the Civil War with that of Eugene Genovese, who is often held up as an icon of the Confederate heritage movement (by people who have read precious little of what he wrote, of course). Share your thoughts in the comments section.
Some of you may remember that over a month ago there was something of a controversy over a decision taken by the administration at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Virginia, to remove replica Confederate flags from Lee Chapel. The university instead decided to return to public display actual Confederate flags on a rotating basis in the museum downstairs at the chapel, near where Robert E. Lee and family members have been laid to rest.
Seems to me there was quite a fuss at first over the university’s decision, but that fuss seems to have died down, as only a handful of Confederate heritage advocates have engaged in “flagging” the university recently.
For all the talk of protests, demonstrations, letter-writing campaigns and the like, the policy put in place this July remains. I’ve seen no signs of that policy changing. Nor have I seen that the wave of protests, now reduced to a few ripples on a pond, have achieved anything, the overheated claims on some Facebook pages and blogs notwithstanding. Instead, we are now approaching the final stages of the drama. Between the return of students to their school (I foresee an uptick in discussion about the new policy from students and faculty), Young Alumni Weekend (September 19-21, 2014), Parents Weekend (October 11-12, 2014), and the Five-Star Festival (October 31-November 2, 2014), there are only a few opportunities left for certain folks to make a big splash.
Otherwise, we can anticipate seeing the occasional snapshots of a few people holding flags while making increasingly hollow claims about changing hearts and minds at Lexington. Sometimes it’s hard to distinguish those images from those taken along the largely empty sidewalks by the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts in Richmond … and when’s the last time you saw a “Virginia Flagger” at the Museum of the Confederacy’s Appomattox branch?
It’s getting boring again.
Oh, I guess one can put up a flagpole here and there near an interstate and claim that’s progress, but those shallow triumphs increasingly resemble a rearguard action. And so another episode in the continuing heritage wars ends, not with a bang, but with a whimper. Pass the Kleenex.
According to someone, it’s just fine to advocate violence against people:
Members of these groups rarely if ever admonish the posters who advocate such violence. Why? Because they know the poster doesn’t mean it. These are not credible threats and most people with common sense realize it. These are simply expressions of anger and frustration about something these folks find distressing.
And so it is with Confederate heritage advocates who post violent comments on Facebook. The floggers try to make some big deal out of it, especially Simpson and the Texas scalawag — but really, how many times have Southern heritage advocates been in the news for perpetrating violence?
Yup … someone went there.
But that’s not all …
Yup … you-know-who went to the race card. I guess reviewing for The Economist wasn’t enough.
“Mr Baptist has not written an objective history of slavery; almost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains — this is not history; it is advocacy.”
Ed Ayers is a Civil War historian who currently serves as president of the University of Richmond. Most recently he also helped advise the University of Mississippi on how to address its connection with Confederate heritage. Ed’s a southerner by birth, but I guess he’s not a True Southron (TM) in the eyes of some people, given what popped up about him in a recent Facebook thread:
Here’s how the New Zealand basketball team came out versus Team USA in their recent basketball game:
Here are highlights from the game that followed:
Thank goodness it wasn’t rugby.
Slavery, I have read so many stories, some very warm and uplifting regarding the family dynamics of slaves and the white family members, the friendships, the black slave boy and the white boy in their many adventures in the countryside, fishing, and other boyhood acts. The girls becoming friends, and the friendships through the years as the white girls married and came back for generations in friendship and interactions with the black slave family.
Wait, there’s more …
Now, Hollywood will produce a movie and show the whips and chains, BUT THIS WAS THE EXCEPTION NOT THE RULE. A beat up broken down slave was of no use to anyone, it made no sense to do these things, and slaves in Virginia from the Colonial days until emancipation were second class family members to be sure, lived and ate separate most of the time, but in private, they on may occasions had a real close slave – slave owner relationship as friends, and shared with each other, but did not want everyone to know as they would be ridiculed by neighbors and friends for doing such, but it did go on.
And so it goes.