Lexington’s Confederate Flag Flap

This fall I’m once again teaching the Civil War and Reconstruction course at ASU.  My next lecture will be on the Compromise of 1850.  I ended my last lecture by outlining the issues facing the nation in 1849 and 1850, including a call by southerners, including Virginia’s John Y. Mason, for a stronger fugitive slave law to overcome the efforts of northern states to restrict the operation of the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793 with personal liberty laws … in short, state rights on behalf of freedom versus the use of federal power on behalf of slavery.

Some students are surprised by that argument.  After all, weren’t white southerners talking about the importance of state rights?  Why, yes, sometimes they were.  Sometimes they weren’t.  After all, state rights are a means to an end, and it is the end in this case–the protection of slavery–that provides the theme of such efforts.  When state rights protected slavery, cite state rights.  When state rights protects freedom, cite federal authority.

I’m reminded of that in reading about a recent controversy in Lexington, Virginia, where the city council voted 4-1 to uphold an ordinance that prohibited displays of the Confederate Battle Flag (and certain other flags) on public flagpoles (specifically, flagpoles used to hang banners from streetlamps, but other public property as well).  You can read about that decision and the reaction to it here and here and here.

Not everyone supports this decision, including people who proclaim themselves defenders of Confederate heritage (although they sometimes claim that they are defending southern heritage, I never see them defend anything but Confederate heritage).  Many of these people do not reside in Lexington.  Apparently they would like to force their preferences down the throats of the people of Lexington (although they claim that it was wrong for Lincoln to force his preferences down the throats of white southerners, and they protested when the NAACP and other groups called for the Confederate flag to be removed from the top of the South Carolina state house … how dare those outsiders mess with South Carolina!).  In that case as well, South Carolinians made their own decision.  That controversy continues.

The city ordinance concerns only the use of public property.  It does not address the display of the Confederate flag by private citizens.  Thus the notion that the ordinance is a blow against the First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech is a frivolous claim.  One hears cries for a boycott of Lexington by the same people who protested calls to boycott South Carolina for its use of the Confederate flag (several groups remain unhappy that the flag is exhibited on the grounds of the state capitol as part of a historical display).  That’s their choice, and an altogether proper one … but then they shouldn’t complain when other people use the same weapon to protest the display of the Confederate flag.

As you might well imagine, several bloggers and other online groups called attention to the controversy, including Boston’s own Kevin Levin, fresh from his encounter with John Stauffer.  Although at first it looked as if Kevin was going to pass this one by, we can see in this series of posts (1, 2, 3, and 4).  Clearly part of the story is the reaction to the decision to reaffirm the original decision earlier this year.  Defenders of Confederate heritage seem oblivious to the irony abounding in their protests and unaware of how their actions contradict their supposed beliefs … for the only thing they are consistent on is that Confederate heritage be celebrated, even if it means outsiders trying to force that idea down the throats of Lexington’s citizens … just the sort of thing they have previously protested elsewhere.  That they then define Confederate heritage in ways that contradict Confederate (and southern and American) history is a topic left for another time.  As I’ve said before, it’s heritage, not history, that they want to commemorate.

If you want to see samples of that defense, well, you can find them on your own … the truly curious know where to look.


5 thoughts on “Lexington’s Confederate Flag Flap

  1. Andy Hall September 4, 2011 / 10:20 am

    No doubt the folks who are torqued about Lexington will apply what might rightly be described as a “no true Southron” rationalization, a transparent rhetorical trick to dismiss the city council vote there as illegitimate. They will argue that the Lexington residents who signed the original petition are not really Southerners, that they’re college kids and liberal professors from up north, that long-time residents who spoke in favor of the ordinance don’t understand their heritage, that the council members who voted in favor of the ordinance could not have done so in good faith after careful consideration, but are merely bowing to political correctness, and so on. It’s much easier to explain this outcome away by arguing that supporters of the ordinance are duplicitous and/or stupid, than to acknowledge that (as reported in the local paper) that “almost all of the speakers who were city of Lexington residents, such as Beth Knapp, spoke in favor of the new policy,” that residents from other parts of the county were about evenly divided, and it was those from outside the area who “unanimously opposed the ordinance.”

    I don’t recall similarly-contentious disputes in my area, but I don’t think I’d have a lot of patience with folks from other areas, or other states even, interjecting themselves in a local issue, regardless of what side they took, and regardless of what larger “agenda” they thought they were opposing.

  2. Ray O'Hara September 5, 2011 / 8:03 am

    When the Monster Seats were put in Bucky Dent got himself tickets and attended a game

    Bucky Dent’s Baseball School. http://www.buckydentbaseballschool.com/
    hmmmm something looks familiar what can it be?

  3. Lexington September 5, 2011 / 4:29 pm

    I’m a proud white southerner who spend much of my childhood being dragged to Daughters of the Confederacy meetings. When I saw that sea of rebel flags in my new town last week, all I could think was “OMG, where am I living? What are the (extremely underrepresented) African American freshman who just moved here going to think of this redneckery?” then I rushed to pick up my child from school an took the long way home. What a releif to hear that the vast majority of flag wavers came to town from elsewhere. My initial belief that Lexington was a town populated by people who knew how to celebrate southern culture intelligently turned out to have been well founded. Excellent post. I’m happy I stumbled upon your blog.

    Crossroads? That wouldn’t be a reference to the Robert Johnson song about being left without a ride home in a Mississippi sundown town, is it? I’m always puzzled by these Confederate types who want to preserve southern culture and history, yet seem to have no appreciation of it. Maybe reading more of your blog will help me understand it. This complex and, yes, at times tortured region has contributed immensely to our nation, why toss all of that rich culture aside in favor of “rebel pride?”

  4. Ray O'Hara September 5, 2011 / 9:22 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s