Irvin McDowell – if only to get folks to stop calling him “Irwin”.
And I suspect there’s some fourth corporal who temporarily led three Confederate soldiers in battle – or to fetch water – who has not been the subject of a major bio. Though I may be wrong about that.
Ulrich Dahlgren…and I know just the guy to do it…8>)
Jim BalesNovember 5, 2011 / 10:06 pm
How about:
Herman Haupt
Joshqia Gorgas
Bes,
Jim Bales
Stefan Papp jr.November 6, 2011 / 3:20 am
Samuel Ryan Curtis
Lynn MercerNovember 6, 2011 / 5:09 am
Robert H. Milroy
Gene SchmielNovember 6, 2011 / 6:36 am
Yes, it’s shameless self-promotion, but I am working on a biography of Jacob D. Cox, one of the best “political generals” of the Union effort, an important politician after the war, and by far the best/most objective historian of the war from among the participants.
A bio was recently done of MacPherson (by Waldsmith), but it was withdrawn due to plagerism-type concerns. It wasn’t very good, IMO, so I would think he would be a good choice.
John FoskettNovember 6, 2011 / 9:15 am
Joe Hooker – for the heck of it, if nothing else. It’s been a long time since Herbert’s book. Harry actually makes a good suggestion, however. If Sigel and Banks can get modern biois, the man of “monstrous fine” fame should as well. As for Robert’s question, a female biographer (name escapes me) did something on McPherson a couple of years ago, IIRC.
Carl SchenkerNovember 6, 2011 / 9:33 am
John — I think Tamara A. Smith did a dissertation on McPherson, then an article in “Grant’s Lieutenant’s: From Cairo to Vicksburg.” I am under the impression that she is now working to bring forth a book. JBM does seem understudied relative to his importance and reputation — the only posthumous figure in “Grant and His Generals.” CRS
P.S. I have the Waldsmith book mentioned by Jim Epperson — was not aware of the withdrawal Jim reports.
TF SmithNovember 6, 2011 / 11:16 am
I’d like to suggest something a little different – rather than a single biography, how about a parallel lives type work on the Eastern corps-level commanders in 1861-62 – from Patterson and McDowell in 1861 through to Sumner, Heintzelman, Keyes, Porter, and Franklin in 1862 through to Hooker, Meade, Burnside, Reno, Cox, Mansfield, Banks, Fremont, and Sigel…
There has been a lot of work done on the commanders in the East at the level of GBM/Scott/Pope/Halleck; some attention to those charged with carrying their various strategies and concepts, at a time when the corps commander was a new role in the US Army, would be interesting and very useful.
At one point, I think Bill Shea was working on a bio of Samuel Curtis; not sure if that’s true or not.
I would second (or third) the need for a MacPherson biography. The Waldsmith one was inadequate.
I would also suggest the need for a biography of A.J. Smith, and a new one for William Rosecrans.
Andy
NickNovember 7, 2011 / 8:37 pm
I think Nathaniel Lyon could use a new biography. The only recent biography on him, written by Christopher Phillips in the mid 90s, was heavy on psychoanalysis and perhaps went a bit too far in attacking the actions of Lyon without putting events in their proper context.
Although a figure not directly involved in the Civil War, as he had passed away shortly before the war began, I also think Missouri senator Thomas Hart Benton deserves a new biography; there hasn’t been one written on him since 1958, which is amazing considering his important role in Missouri antebellum politics, he desire for westward expansion, and his eventual desire to prohibit slavery’s extension, despite being a Democrat.
Silas Chandler
Irvin McDowell – if only to get folks to stop calling him “Irwin”.
And I suspect there’s some fourth corporal who temporarily led three Confederate soldiers in battle – or to fetch water – who has not been the subject of a major bio. Though I may be wrong about that.
Has anyone done a biography of McPherson?
Ulrich Dahlgren…and I know just the guy to do it…8>)
How about:
Herman Haupt
Joshqia Gorgas
Bes,
Jim Bales
Samuel Ryan Curtis
Robert H. Milroy
Yes, it’s shameless self-promotion, but I am working on a biography of Jacob D. Cox, one of the best “political generals” of the Union effort, an important politician after the war, and by far the best/most objective historian of the war from among the participants.
William Mahone
A bio was recently done of MacPherson (by Waldsmith), but it was withdrawn due to plagerism-type concerns. It wasn’t very good, IMO, so I would think he would be a good choice.
Joe Hooker – for the heck of it, if nothing else. It’s been a long time since Herbert’s book. Harry actually makes a good suggestion, however. If Sigel and Banks can get modern biois, the man of “monstrous fine” fame should as well. As for Robert’s question, a female biographer (name escapes me) did something on McPherson a couple of years ago, IIRC.
John — I think Tamara A. Smith did a dissertation on McPherson, then an article in “Grant’s Lieutenant’s: From Cairo to Vicksburg.” I am under the impression that she is now working to bring forth a book. JBM does seem understudied relative to his importance and reputation — the only posthumous figure in “Grant and His Generals.” CRS
P.S. I have the Waldsmith book mentioned by Jim Epperson — was not aware of the withdrawal Jim reports.
I’d like to suggest something a little different – rather than a single biography, how about a parallel lives type work on the Eastern corps-level commanders in 1861-62 – from Patterson and McDowell in 1861 through to Sumner, Heintzelman, Keyes, Porter, and Franklin in 1862 through to Hooker, Meade, Burnside, Reno, Cox, Mansfield, Banks, Fremont, and Sigel…
There has been a lot of work done on the commanders in the East at the level of GBM/Scott/Pope/Halleck; some attention to those charged with carrying their various strategies and concepts, at a time when the corps commander was a new role in the US Army, would be interesting and very useful.
Isn’t that largely what Taafde’s Commanding the Army of the Potomac was?
Governor John Andrew
Rich Cairn of the Hampshire Educational Collaborative in Northampton suggests Frederick Douglass, and I consider this an excellent suggestion!
David Blight is working on a Douglass biography.
Edwin M. Stanton, Gideon Welles and Edward Bates.
Best
Rob
George Washington Getty
John T. Wilder (The Lightning Brigade)
Adelbert Ames
At one point, I think Bill Shea was working on a bio of Samuel Curtis; not sure if that’s true or not.
I would second (or third) the need for a MacPherson biography. The Waldsmith one was inadequate.
I would also suggest the need for a biography of A.J. Smith, and a new one for William Rosecrans.
Andy
I think Nathaniel Lyon could use a new biography. The only recent biography on him, written by Christopher Phillips in the mid 90s, was heavy on psychoanalysis and perhaps went a bit too far in attacking the actions of Lyon without putting events in their proper context.
Although a figure not directly involved in the Civil War, as he had passed away shortly before the war began, I also think Missouri senator Thomas Hart Benton deserves a new biography; there hasn’t been one written on him since 1958, which is amazing considering his important role in Missouri antebellum politics, he desire for westward expansion, and his eventual desire to prohibit slavery’s extension, despite being a Democrat.
D.H. Hill
George Gordon Meade
Simon Bolivar Buckner