Fall Semester Opens at Washington and Lee

As the fall semester opened at Washington and Lee University, President Kenneth Ruscio took the time at the university’s opening convocation to sound themes that would inform the coming academic year. You can read the full text here.

As to this summer’s controversy … which is fast dwindling into a kerfuffle … Ruscio had this to say:

I’m referring, of course, to our decisions to remove the decorative, replica Confederate battle flags from the statue chamber in Lee Chapel’s public space and thereby return that area to the way it was envisioned originally by Lee’s family and Lee’s friends and the way it stood for its first 60 years; to restore some original flags and display them in the Lee Chapel Museum, which is the appropriate way for an educational institution to treat genuine historic artifacts; to examine our history straightforwardly and accurately, with all the respect history deserves, including the contributions of enslaved African-Americans from 1826 to 1850; to honor our traditions reverently, but not blindly; to behave, in short, as an academic institution ought to behave, especially one mindful of its future as well as its past.

And I’m referring to protests against those steps by groups and individuals who have no connection to the University, who are not part of our community, and whose purposes diverge sharply from ours. They have every right to voice their disagreement. We have an equal right to say that these matters are for Washington and Lee to decide, and that we do not exist as a platform for them to assert their views.

This is not a response to them. We do not wish them ill. They are who they are; we are who we are. And we can’t be distracted by those who object to one piece of what we have done, while we are consumed, as we should be, with the nobler purpose of defining the kind of community we wish to be.

You would think that people who talk all the time about self-determination would have no problem with this statement.

Ruscio returned to this theme of community and purpose at the end of his remarks:

I want to return to where I began, which is why the events of this summer were at least one reason for me to consider these deeper questions. In the midst of some of the criticisms we have received from those outside the community, and a few from within, it has been tempting to respond directly. But we have refrained for a variety of reasons, sometimes because we have a university to run, and sometimes because we would have to engage on terms that have little to do with how a university operates. We have a different position because of the values and ideals we hold, and we have a different way of expressing that position, also because of the ideals and values we hold.

In the end, though, we are interested in how we build a community of respect and trust for all who belong to it, where cooperation prevails over confrontation, and thoughtful consideration of diverse views is seen not as a weakness, but as a strength.

With that in mind, from all the letters I have received this summer, let me share with you portions of some that capture that spirit — and captured my attention.

Such as the one from the father of an incoming student who found the University’s position so “thoughtful, rational, even-keeled, as to make me realize once again just how fortunate we are that our son will be matriculating next month.”

The mother of a current student whose ancestry traces back to graduates of what was then Washington College, and whose relatives fought in the Civil War on the side of the Confederacy, who applauded the University’s ability to look deeply at its own history and the nation’s.

The black alumnus who viewed our steps as advancing the dialogue over history-as he said, not “their” history only, but also “my history.”

And then there is this letter, from an alumnus of the Class of 1949:

Dear President Ruscio:
I have been following the issues…. I write to offer my unqualified endorsement of your response to those issues — especially your forceful support of my great-grandfather’s presidency of Washington College and your plans for the Confederate battle flags…

I believe that the five years he spent as Washington College’s president were as important to him as they were to the college. His passion for using his position there to help heal the wounds of war was apparent through both his words and deeds.

Based on everything I have heard or read, it is clear to me that President Lee would wholeheartedly support your goals of making Washington and Lee a welcoming environment for all students who choose to come there today. As a proud alumnus, I, too, support those goals.

In my view, removing the flags from the statuary chamber is overdue…. At the same time, we should not simply ignore the flags and their undeniable historical significance. Your plan of returning the actual battle flags to the Lee Chapel Museum is the ideal way to study and care for these important artifacts.

I am proud of my alma mater. I am certain that my great-grandfather would be proud of the institution he once led. And I know he would appreciate the civil manner in which you have approached what must be emotional discussions. But most important of all, I trust that today’s students will be reminded of just how important the University’s core values are. In my opinion, the qualities of honor, responsibility, civility, service and leadership that Washington and Lee instills in each generation of students are just as important as the exceptional education it provides.

Please know that you have my full support and my best wishes.

Signed: Robert E. Lee IV

These discussions are significant for us. They are about what Washington and Lee has been in the past, what it is today, and what it will be in the future. No matter the differences across time and across generations and across the many individuals who live here today, a common unifying thread binds us all. This is a community based on trust and respect, one that seeks common ground and celebrates our differences, one that seeks, in Giamatti’s wonderful phrase, to become a “free and ordered space,” one where freedom is coupled with responsibility, where individuality is coupled with a commitment to a common good. A place, in other words, that prepares our students for lives as responsible citizens in a democracy.

This is what any university should do, but especially this one. In the months ahead, in the years ahead, we should not shy away from these matters, mindful of our past, mindful of our future, and mindful of our responsibilities today to preserve and enhance this community of trust and respect.


8 thoughts on “Fall Semester Opens at Washington and Lee

  1. Bob Nelson September 11, 2014 / 3:59 pm

    Great comments. Thanks for posting. FWIW, “Community of respect and trust” are almost the exact words I used back in 1995 on being hired as superintendent of Carson City-Crystal schools, a very troubled district. At the first back-to-school breakfast with the staff, I told them that we could continue on a path of self destruction or we could change course. We changed course and the district has done well ever since.

  2. Al Mackey September 11, 2014 / 7:53 pm

    I hear some “outside agitators” plan to go to Lexington to wave some flags.

  3. Billy Bearden September 11, 2014 / 8:35 pm

    I would offer the following:
    1) Mr. Lee IV was most likely completely unaware or the 1930 agreement between
    the UDC, CMLS, and WLU Admin. creating the “Memorial to General Robert E Lee”

    2) Mr. Lee IV, as a student of WLU, most likely did not say a word
    against the “Memorial to General Robert E Lee”

    3) Mr. Lee IV, as an alumni and businessman, is most likely unaware of the 1997 agreement between WLU President Elrod and MoC Director Robin Reed regarding care and enhancement of the “Memorial to General Robert E Lee”

    4) Mr. Lee IV, states incorrectly ” Your plan of returning the actual battle flags to the Lee Chapel Museum is the ideal way to study and care for these important artifacts. ” The return of the flags was not President Ruscio’s idea – that was the plan in the 1997 agreement – but the 97 agreement calls for “..2, possibly 3…” of the war era flags to go into the Museum.

    The reproduction flags were simply ‘place holders’ to maintain the integrity of the “Memorial to General Robert E Lee” until the restored war era flags returned. There was no call in the 1930 nor 1997 agreements to remove from display the flags as was done by President Ruscio. Both 1930 / 1997 agreements use the term “Lee Chapel” numerous times, without mention of “museum”

    Mr. Lee IV is obviously unaware of a great many details, and President Ruscio’s actions of capitulation and violations of 84 years of legal agreements and promises stink to high heaven.
    I admire Mr. Lee IV for expressing an opinion, albeit not based in historical fact.

    What is more telling is that no further Lee descendants offered an opinion.

    • Brooks D. Simpson September 11, 2014 / 11:09 pm

      So what? Just as things changed in 1930, so they changed in 2014.

      For all this talk of legal action, it seems to me that this will go down the same road as threats against the VMFA, MOC, and Tripp Lewis’s promises of legal action. Why don’t you just put up a flag along I-81 and declare victory? 🙂

      • Andrew Raker September 12, 2014 / 8:49 am

        I am sure Mr. Lee has already changed his mind thanks to Billy’s list of agreements that are no longer binding.

    • John Foskett September 12, 2014 / 7:07 am

      It is telling. Now you figure it out….

    • Jimmy Dick September 12, 2014 / 7:52 am

      I would venture that Mr. Lee knows more about this than you do. You have a habit of citing things that are not true or did not exist. Furthermore, you try to act like your opinion holds the force of law and it definitely does not. You keep forgetting one basic thing: It is not your grave site. It does not belong to you in any way, shape, or form. Mr. Lee has far more claim to say what should be or not be at the grave site of his ancestor than you or any of the neo-confederates ever will have.

  4. Andrew Raker September 12, 2014 / 9:00 am

    “And we can’t be distracted by those who object to one piece of what we have done, while we are consumed, as we should be, with the nobler purpose of defining the kind of community we wish to be.”

    I’ve spent the night in Lexington a couple of times when traveling between Indiana and DC, partly because of a great little microbrewery set up by two professors at WLU. And while there, I’d chat with them and their faculty friends about the university, and what they do in terms of teaching and research. The kind of issues Billy Bearden raised never came up, but bright engaged students who were interested in research, but who also gave back to Lexington and Rockbridge County did.

    So I agree with Ruscio that there have been too many distractions involved with this, and I think it’s right that the university hasn’t engaged with its detractors because it’s been too busy being a university. But he’s also taken this to be a teaching moment about what a good university should be. He’s been an able and adroit leader of WLU, and I’m glad they have him as president.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s