Susan Hathaway Tells Us That She Doesn’t Pay Attention

It’s always interesting when someone tells you at great length and in great detail how they aren’t listening to you in a communication that betrays precisely the opposite. It’s even better when they do this time after time after time.

What … no red?

So it is with Susan Hathaway, the most visible member of the Virginia Flaggers (well, except outside the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts), who took time this week to tell us all once more that she doesn’t listen to what her critics have to say. She pays them no heed and they don’t bother her.

VF SFH 112715

I am glad to see that Susan can go into so much detail about how she does not pay attention to what is said about her. I only wish she had taken the opportunity to tell her fanbase why she does not feel it is important enough to protest in person at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts.

We understand that her celebration of white supremacists as members of the Virginia Flaggers, her willingness to be photographed with white nationalists, her refusal to express her unhappiness that antisemitic white nationalists newsletters freely reprint her material, and so on, are not topics that she wants to address. So we can now safely assume that in light of this public statement that these things are acceptable and may even carry her tacit approval. After all, if Susan Hathaway can break her silence to chide her critics, one can assume that she’d break her silence to chide those who misuse their association with her and the Virginia Flaggers.

That is, unless they aren’t misusing it at all.

Note that Hathaway, unlike her sidekick Norwood “Tripp[y]” Lewis, doesn’t threaten to sue people. Perhaps she doesn’t want to be known as “Sue-’em” Hathaway.

But we do wish we had this statement on video. Think of the possibilities. But at least she checked her spelling this time.

So we thank Susan Hathaway for reminding us that she doesn’t mind having her reports reprinted in white supremacist antisemitic newsletters, for example, and that we should draw no adverse conclusions from her willingness to be photographed with white nationalists and to march with such folks. Otherwise, she’d say something, right? She’s just shown us that she’s selective with her silence.

And, of course, we await word as to whether Hathaway and the Flaggers are mad enough yet about the decision of Richmond’s famous St. Paul’s Episcopal Church to reconsider and in some cases to remove Confederate iconography from the church. After all, if you are going to shower Confederate flags all over the place where Jefferson Davis received word of Robert E. Lee’s surrender, you should also shower them all over the place where Davis opened a message from Lee announcing his decision to evacuate Richmond and Petersburg. It’s rather nice of the Flaggers to mark such places of Confederate defeat and humiliation in that fashion–even if it means obtaining sites from suspected racists (not that the Flaggers would have anything to do with such people, right?).

I’m so glad Susan Hathaway was thinking of me this Thanksgiving. She is to Confederate heritage what the Philadelphia Eagles were to football yesterday. While the rest of us gathered with friends to give thanks and enjoy each other’s company, it appears Susan was seething as she passed the stuffing.

As for the illustration accompanying the declarations … nice period dress. 🙂

Note: We are not alone in our appreciation of Susan’s message. Oh … gee … more links to white nationalists/supremacists? Oh my. Time not to pay attention again, Susan.



10 thoughts on “Susan Hathaway Tells Us That She Doesn’t Pay Attention

  1. Betty Giragosian November 27, 2015 / 1:58 pm is St.Paul’s Episcopal Church.

  2. rcocean November 27, 2015 / 6:45 pm

    “I’m so glad Susan Hathaway was thinking of me this Thanksgiving.”
    Wow. Projecting Much? Really, these kinds of posts make you look like a Kook.

    • Brooks D. Simpson November 27, 2015 / 11:02 pm

      I know you’re not the brightest person about, but the fact is that Susan composed her whining rant (unless you are telling me someone else wrote it for her) and had it posted just after Thanksgiving. This post is a response to that — so it could not have been contemplated during Thanksgiving. But don’t let the obvious deter you from making a fool of yourself. With friends like you, she’s in trouble.

      I guess you don’t understand the concept of projection. Then again, maybe you do when you call someone a kook. Confederate heritage rarely attracts people of ability.

      Having trouble driving traffic to your blog? Is that because you have nothing worthwhile to say? Tell you what … try harder. You’re about to be unread here. Check back in a few days and see what I mean.

  3. OhioGuy November 27, 2015 / 10:54 pm

    “I am glad to see that Susan can go into so much detail about how she does not pay attention to what is said about her.” This is an excellent point, Brooks. I will only add that she also appears to know very little about U.S. defamation law. Perhaps, she thinks she can sue under Confederate law. 😉

    • Rblee22468 November 28, 2015 / 8:10 am

      In order to sue someone for slander and libel, what they are saying has to be false. That’s the real problem. They are just trying to spin it for the Koolaid drinkers. No one in the real world buys any of the garbage they’re peddling.

  4. The Lamp November 28, 2015 / 5:30 pm

    Wow talk about living rent-free in someone’s head! We were just handed keys to the penthouse!

  5. Mousy Tongue December 3, 2015 / 11:59 pm

    Guess who’s rounding out the year with her THIRD article in The First Freedom 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s