In years to come, people may argue that the events of 2015 offered a turning point in the debate over the proper way to commemorate Confederate heritage. A lone gunman’s decision to slaughter several African Americans in Charleston, South Carolina, sparked a debate that transcended previous discussions of the display of such symbols, and thus accelerated change that had already been occurring gradually elsewhere. By year’s end, Confederate flags had been removed from public grounds in several places, as were a number of statues of prominent Confederates, while the ultimate fate of other icons remained in the balance.
Here and there, of course, advocates of the display of Confederate flags and icons claimed victory when the best they were able to do was to preserve the status quo. If any public authority added the Confederate flag for display, that event received no attention (I’m unaware that Confederate heritage advocates gained a single square inch of ground). Simply put, when it comes to the years of the Civil War sesquicentennial, Confederate heritage has been in retreat, from Richmond and Lexington to Columbia and Austin, and from New Orleans and Memphis to Oxford and Pensacola. And, in many ways, 2015 has been the worst years of them all.
One way to measure the fading away of Confederate heritage is to look as the struggles of our favorite Confederate heritage group, the Virginia Flaggers, supposedly the “future of Confederate heritage.” Now, I’m sure some of you will point out that the Flaggers thought this year was a great success, because they raised more Confederate flags across the Old Dominion, especially in Danville and Lexington. That few people noticed and even fewer cared about these hollow victories is of no concern to true believers, but for the rest of us, it looked to be a year characterized by setbacks and self-inflicted wounds.
12. For example, there was new evidence of the close ties between the Virginia Flaggers and groups that preach intolerance. The Flaggers saw their columns appear in a white supremacist antisemitic paper, complete with appeals for funds (those new flags cost money). The Flaggers themselves linked white supremacy with Confederate heritage when they decried the attack upon a monument marking the 1874 “Battle of Liberty Place,” seeing it as part of the heritage they wanted to cherish and honor.
11. The Flaggers lost battles to preserve the flying of the Confederate flag outside the Sutherlin Mansion in Danville and the celebration of Lee-Jackson Day as an official holiday in Charlottesville. However, it was amusing to watch their efforts to defend Confederate heritage, especially Karen Cooper’s ranting at Charlottesville.
10. The Flaggers were outraged that the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts declined to renew its agreement with the Sons of Confederate Veterans about the use of the War Memorial Chapel … symbolic public birthplace of the Flagger movement. Oh well.
9. Although the Flaggers were also outraged when St. Paul’s in Richmond decided to revisit its position on the display of Confederate iconography, they decided that they simply weren’t going to do anything meaningful about it. What a shame. I was so looking forward to dozens of pictures showing a handful of protesters outside the church.
8. Anytime you want to laugh out loud, remember this: Karen Cooper became a national celebrity when she proclaimed that slavery was a choice. Of course, Cooper also claimed that she was a slave to the federal government, so I guess she made that choice, too. She’s also chosen to be much quieter since then, a wise choice given her public performances. It’s not everyone who is honored by The Onion, after all.
7. The mouthpiece of the Virginia Flaggers was left to wail when the Escambia County Board of County Commissioners finally decided to take down for good the Confederate flag that once flew outside the Bay Center. Every single one of the West Florida Flagger(s) turned out to protest that decision. It did not matter.
6. Angered that the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts allowed InLight to use the War Memorial Chapel for a display (no doubt in part due to the misleading reporting offered by a Richmond review), the Flaggers turned out in force (for them) outside the chapel, to no effect. Absent from the protest was Susan Hathaway, who had told her people it was time to rise up while she remained seated. In so doing she offered a fine example of heritage hysterics and the depth of her commitment to the cause.
5. The Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans condemned the behavior of the Virginia Flaggers. Enough said.
4. Always quick to deny certain allegations, the Virginia Flaggers were noticeable for their silence when it was suggested that one of its members, posing as “Anonymous CSA,” had been threatening people. A few calls later from the proper authorities and “Anonymous CSA” was silent, too.
3. Always hungry for publicity, the Virginia Flaggers probably did not enjoy the national attention focused on the group in connection with the disappearance and recovery of Lilly Baumann. They sure were silent about the fate of a little girl they had once exploited for their own ends. At least this time it wasn’t Tripp Lewis who was arrested.
2. Remember all those flagpoles going up across Virginia? Well, in a few reported cases, the fellows who allowed the Flaggers to use their property to display Confederate flags were … you guessed it … avowed racists and haters. Funny that a group that talks about heritage, not hate, and who wants to restore the honor likes to do business with those sorts of people.
And this leaves us with the top Flagger fail for 2015:
This was Flagger greatness personified.
Look, it could have been worse … I could have asked you to sing along with Susan Hathaway.
And, so, folks, it’s on to Lexington in January, where the Virginia Flaggers will call upon everyone to boycott local businesses … until the Flaggers get a craving for chili dogs and ice cream.
A brief overview of the group can be found here: http://meettheflaggers.blogspot.com
The financials released by the City of Lexington for the last fiscal year show an increase in restaurant food tax revenue of almost 16%, putting over $1M into the city’s coffers in FY 2015.
That’s a lot of chili dogs, my friend.
I’m sure Barry can pack ’em away.
The flaggers seem to define success in a way no one else does. Their definition of success is to wave flags, make noise, and take pictures of each other. They think FaceBook likes mean tangible progress. The fact that they have caused no change and in fact are consistently being marginalized and ignored by the general public is ignored because that would mean acknowledging their failures.
Just look at how they are making an impact in Lexington. They claim their boycott will bring the merchants of Lexington to their knees demanding the city government change the policy on the CBF. First of all, the only way their boycott can be considered a success is if the definition of a boycott means to increase the city tax revenue. Second, their idea of a boycott seems to include eating at Lexington restaurants.
Let’s face it, the flaggers are special people. They enjoy their self-delusions. Let’s let them play with the flags and feel good about themselves while we educate people about what really happened in the Civil War and Reconstruction.
The Virginia Flaggers will have to seek an alternative outlet for themselves:
I am sure she will be back to continue lying about the Civil War, spreading her racist and bigoted views, and generally whining about America leaving her type in the dustbin of history. She hasn’t met a fact yet that she can’t ignore when it proves her wrong. In that respect she’s cognitive dissonance personified.
What’s the over/under on how long this happy hiatus will last? You have to pity her poor hubby.
I just hope she’s okay and in good health.