It’s come to my attention that a commenter on this blog is a registered sex offender in his home state. Specifically, the commenter is charged with “using communications system to contact a minor.” This is confirmed on an official state registry of sex offenders.
I’ve decided that the commenter in question will not be allowed to comment on this blog.
Another past commenter was blocked a long time ago from this blog. People who are familiar with my relationship with this person know that I did not care for him personally, and he finally wore out his welcome here. He then turned to frequenting other groups, including one managed by our good friend Connie Chastain. Subsequently, he was arrested and charged with trafficking in child pornography.
I’ve never met either of these people.
Both of these stories are upsetting and nauseating. So is the news that Connie Chastain, who does Susan Hathaway’s “heavy hitting,” is now conducting background checks on commenters on this blog, much as several Virginia Flaggers went after individuals this past summer.
Chastain can’t get her facts straight, as usual, at least when it comes to me. She claims that someone I’ve despised for some time (and she knows this from a previous exchange on Al Mackey’s blog) is a friend of mine … although, in truth he spent a good deal of time on Connie’s chat group. But we can expect these sort of lies from someone who claims to be an expert in false accusations … after all, she makes them all the time. Of at least as much interest is that she’s now going into the background of commenters on this blog.
Connie adds that the commenters on this blog are not concerned about issues involving sex, pornography, and minors.
I’m sure there will be all kind of pedo enabling/defending at the Crossroads cesspool tomorrow…. NOT! They don’t care when somebody on THEIR side does it…
Crazy … ugly … or both? But let’s make this clear: she doesn’t think much of you.
Carl Roden followed up with some of his typically crude comments. He just likes to write fiction about sex between minors.
Of course, Connie claims she’s not responsible for the behavior of the commenters on her blog. But why should anyone be surprised by her brazen hypocrisy?
Or her brazen stupidity? After all, on December 10, 2013, she posted the following on Al Mackey’s blog:
There is no tie between the VaFlaggers and Matthew Heimbach any more than there is a tie between, say, Brooks Simpson and, oh, say, people who solicit minors, just because [XXX X’XXXX] posted on his blog.
And yet now she suggests there is a tie … which leads one to accept that she also now admits that there’s a tie between Matthew Heimbach and the Virginia Flaggers. Yet more proof that even the Flaggers’ spokesperson now confesses to the relationship.
(This post also shows that Connie Chastain was doing her background checks before the Confederate Heritage Follies series began to appear. Note that she ignored my response in her haste to conduct a smear campaign … ’cause she knows she can’t defend Confederate heritage on its merits.)
This is the person who Susan Hathaway says does her heavy hitting, and as Flaggers and their supporters have rushed to comment on this issue, we understand the connection. I just thought you should know how this associate of the Virginia Flaggers operates.
Restore the honor indeed.
Again, a sad story … and an example of what an outspoken supporter of the Flaggers plans to do to commenters on this blog.